








 |
 |  | 

Budget Challenges
The recent economic downturn is having far-reaching implications for Cuyahoga County, as well as RTA.
A significant reduction in Sales Tax revenue, cuts in State Transit Funding and employment-related loss of ridership and fare revenue require that
RTA examine all available options to fulfill our mission "to provide the maximum amount of high quality service to our customers, with the revenue
we receive".
The purpose of this web page is to keep RTA customers, employees and the public in general informed of financial challenges and the ways that the
GCRTA is attempting to meet those challenges.
This information will be updated on a regular basis. If you have any questions that you would like us to respond to, or have any suggestions or
comments that you would like to share with us, please contact us at public-comment@gcrta.org.
What are the causes for RTA's current budget challenges?
The reason for RTA's budget challenge is a significant drop in revenues.
RTA's revenues come from three primary sources:
- Sales Tax
- Government Subsidies and Grants
- Passenger Fares
- Sales Tax
- RTA gets a 1% Sales Tax on goods sold in Cuyahoga County.
- This is RTA's largest source of revenue, representing between 60% and 70% of RTA's Operating Budget.
- Sales Tax is directly impacted by the local economy. Between 1990 and 2001, when the economy was stronger than it is today, the annual
increase in the sales tax averaged approximately 5.6%. This was RTA's expansion period when the Waterfront Line was built, and when the
Community Circulator and suburban Park-N-Ride Services were started.
- Since 2001, the local economy has weakened. Between 2001 and 2008, the annual increase in the sales tax averaged only approximately 1%.
- In 2009, unemployment, the tightening of the credit market, and the falling of consumer confidence caused by the national recession, have
significantly impacted receipts from the Sales Tax.
- After the first 11 months of 2009 (January thru November), the Sales Tax is $17,474,016 less than was collected in the first 101
months of 2008.
- The current projection is that by year's end, Sales Tax collections will be $18.5 million below 2008 levels, from $173.5 million down to approximately $155 million.
- If, beginning in 2010, sales tax receipts increase at a rate of 2%, which is twice the annual rate experienced between 2001 and 2008, it
will take 6 years (until 2015) for the Sales Tax to once again reach the level collected in 2008.
- Government Subsidies and Grants
Federal Government - In the early years of this program, the Federal Government provided Capital Grants to assist in the purchasing of
capital goods, such as buses, trains, train stations, transit centers, etc., and Operating Assistance to assist with expenses associated with
operator and mechanic labor, health and retirement benefits, and for fuel and utilities.
A change in the Federal Program in 1993 eliminated Operating Assistance to transit agencies. Because this change was so significant, it was
phased in between 1993 and 1998.
The Capital Grant portion of the Federal Program continues and provides funds by a formula to each qualifying transit system in the nation,
based upon factors such as population and population density. For qualifying purchases, these grants can typically be used to pay for up to
80% of the cost of the Capital good.
Over the years, the definition of Capital has been expanded and now includes labor costs expended to maintain capital goods purchased under the
program.
Although declines in population experienced in the Greater Cleveland area have impacted the relative amount of Federal funds allocated to RTA, by and large, this program has kept pace with inflation.
State of Ohio Funding - The State of Ohio has never been an aggressive partner in funding public transportation when compared to other
states. The typical State in the United States provides approximately 23% of the operating costs of its transit systems. For comparison, Ohio
provides less than 3%.
The State of Ohio invests only 0.77% of the total transportation spending on public transit, putting it 40th out of the 50 states in the
nation. All the states in the nation that spend less on transit than Ohio are more rural states, with an average population of only 20% of
the population of Ohio.
In 2002, Ohio provided $43 million to the transit systems in Ohio. By 2007, that number dropped 63% to $16.3 million. If that wasn't bad
enough, in the 2010/2011 State of Ohio budget just approved, funding was cut another 33% to $10.6 million.
This represents a 75% cut in State of Ohio funding since 2002.
- Passenger Fares
Passenger fares cover approximately 20% of the operating cost of RTA's service. Over the past few years, RTA has increased fares several times
in attempts to achieve a balanced budget, and preserve needed services for our customers.
Passenger fares were increased again on September 1, 2009 to a base fare of $2.25. Each 25¢ increase represents approximately
$4.5 million annually in revenue to RTA. If fares were not increased, more needed service would need to be eliminated.
With the current recession, and the resulting drop in ridership that RTA is experiencing since April 2009, which is a direct result
of rising unemployment, we are now projecting that passenger fares will be approximately $2 million under budget by 2009 year's end.
It is important to note that although the one way cash fare is $2.25, the average per ride fare collected by RTA is approximately $1.00, due to
discounts provides to senior citizens, persons with disabilities and to customers purchasing and using multi-ride passes such as the all-day pass and
the monthly pass.
Is this just an RTA issue?
The answer is no. A recent study conducted by the American Public Transportation Association concluded that 9 of 10 transit systems in the United
States either have recently or are in the process of reducing service and/or raising fares.
Since transit systems are typically funded through sources such as a Sales Tax, Payroll Tax or Property Tax, the recession is impacting almost
everyone.
Because revenues have dropped, what steps has RTA taken to attempt to achieve a balanced budget?
- RTA Has Reduced Expenses
- RTA began last year taking aggressive steps to reduce expenses. At the end of 2008, RTA eliminated 5% of all salaried positions, and
informed the salaried staff that there will be a wage freeze for 2009.
- Restrictions were put on overtime and travel, and a hiring freeze was imposed on all non-critical positions.
- After getting the Ohio Law changed to allow it, RTA began to purchase fuel through the futures market at significant savings. As a result,
it is anticipated that our cost of fuel for 2010 will be $8 million less than it was in 2009. We currently have all our fuel purchased for
2010 and have 60% of our needed fuel purchased for 2011, at very favorable prices.
- With the impact of the recession being worse than anticipated, RTA went one step further in May than the wage freeze for the salaried staff,
by reducing salaries of the salaried staff by 3% effective June 1, 2009.
- In July, RTA announced an additional elimination of staff positions by 3%, no later than November 1, 2009.
- RTA is even deferring the issuance of the last paycheck of 2009 until January 1, 2010, for non-union salaried staff, to assist in balancing
the 2009 budget.
- RTA is currently working closely with its two unions on strategies to reduce costs, retain positions and minimize service cuts. Our
contract with the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) expired on July 31, 2009, and both sides are actively negotiating. RTA's contract with the
Fraternal order of Police (FOP) will expire on February 28, 2010.
- Identified New Funding Sources
- RTA has been aggressively trying to identify supplemental funding to help balance the 2009 budget, and with some success:
- RTA was able to get funding to pay for the operating costs of the Downtown Trolleys for 2009 in the amount of $783,000. This funding
may also be available for 2010 and 2011.
- RTA was able to use a portion of its ARRA Stimulus funds to assist the operating budget. The amount RTA can use for this purpose is
$3.456 million for 2009. These are one-time funds and will not be available in 2010 or beyond.
- RTA was able to secure $3 million of CMAQ funds to help offset the operating costs associated with the HealthLine. RTA is trying
to secure up to $7.3 million for this purpose in 2010.
- RTA is actively working with ODOT and NOACA on other possible funding sources to help balance the 2010 budget.
Is RTA's Budget Balanced for 2009?
Based upon July projections, RTA was projecting a $5 million deficit at 2009 year's end if action was not taken. That is why RTA immediately began to implement the plans
that were adopted in December 2008 to balance the budget (see below).
These steps alone will not balance the 2009 budget but will get RTA close. Additional funds are being sought, and additional expenses identified for cuts.
What actions are being taken to balance the 2009 Budget?
When the RTA Board of Trustees passed the 2009 budget in December 2008, financial challenges were already a reality. For that reason, the approved
budget said that if additional funding was not received, fares would be increased and service cut in September 2009. This plan is now being
implemented.
- Effective September 1, 2009, an increase of 25¢ in the base fare was imposed, generating an additional $1.5 million in revenue by 2009
year end.
- Effective September 20, 2009, all 12 Community Circulator routes were eliminated, and service will also be cut on 15 big bus routes. These
service cuts will save approximately $1.6 million by 2009 year end.
These steps alone will not balance the 2009 budget but will get RTA close. Additional funds are being sought, and additional expenses identified for
cuts.
Through the end of the 3rd quarter, it is now projected that RTA will have a positive ending balance for 2009 of approximately $900,000. This is still contingent upon several grants being received and processed by year's end.
Based upon an RTA proposal and input received at the 12 public informational meetings, RTA staff also modified 6 big bus routes, which were also effective
September 20, 2009, to better serve our customers.
Weekly Shopper Service
RTA has also proposed a weekly shopper service to operate in the areas previously served by the Community Circulators. In this proposal, RTA will provide the buses and
most of the operating costs, while we ask the impacted communities involved to seek sponsorship dollars for the balance of the costs, or $15,000 annually. Regular RTA
fares will be charged.
If this new one-day-a-week service is of interest to the 12 communities, RTA hopes to begin planning the service in the fall, and to begin operating this new service in
early 2010.
What are the projections for the 2010 budget and beyond?
Based upon the Tax Budget approved by the RTA Board of Trustees in July and submitted to Cuyahoga County, the deficit for 2010 may be as high as $29
million.
The actions now being taken by RTA, in the form of the fare increase on September 1, 2009, and the Service Cut on September 20, 2009, will reduce
the amount of that projected deficit to approximately $16 million.
Balancing the 2010 budget will require additional actions, in terms of reducing expenses and maximizing revenues.
How has the weak local economy impacted RTA staffing?
The weak local economic has dramatically impacted RTA staffing.
- In 2000, RTA had 3,086 employees
- As of June 30, 2009, RTA had 2,475 employees
- It is anticipated that at 2009 year's end, RTA will have approximately 2,375 employees.
The big question is the future. With a currently projected deficit of $16 million for 2010, if efficiencies cannot be realized and labor costs
reduced, many additional positions will need to be eliminated.
As a rule of thumb, the cost for each position at RTA is approximately $75,000, which includes salary, fringe benefits, retirement costs and payroll
taxes.
That means to address a $7.5 million deficit, it would mean the elimination of 100 employees. To address a $15 million deficit would mean the
elimination of 200 employees.
Is population loss a factor in RTA's future?
The simple answer is "yes".
Between 1990 and 2008, the Cuyahoga County population decreased approximately 8%, while the City of Cleveland population declined approximately 13%.
Why is this important?
- Population is a major factor in the development of Federal funding formulas.
- If there are less people, there are less people for RTA to serve
- If there are less people, there are less people to support RTA with their contribution to the countywide Sales Tax.
How does RTA compare to other transit systems in Ohio?
RTA is, by far, the largest transit system in Ohio. RTA serves more customers than the transit systems in Columbus, Cincinnati, Dayton and Toledo
combined.
The following is a comparison of ridership and transit miles operated in 2008 by the four largest transit systems in Ohio:
| Total Passengers | Total Miles of Service |
| Cleveland RTA | 62,391,000 | 24,729,000 |
| Cincinnati Metro | 21,617,000 | 12,805,000 |
| Columbus (COTA) | 16,539,000 | 10,430,000 |
| Dayton RTA | 10,564,000 | 7,367,000 |
Is the Recession Impacting RTA Ridership and Passenger Revenues?
Yes. While RTA experienced six consecutive years of ridership growth between 2003 and 2008, ridership through June 2009 is down 9.2%. This downward
trend started to become significant in April with the rise in unemployment, and has continued. Ridership loss to date for 2009 is as follows:
| January | 4,388,151 | -2.22% |
| February | 4,113,083 | -1.71% |
| March | 4,438,198 | +2.3% |
| April | 4,170,609 | -14.02% |
| May | 4,159,517 | -20.88% |
| June | 4,087,161 | -17.16% |
| July | 3,978,516 | -18.86% |
| August | 4,205,948 | -15.56% |
| September | 4,269,225 | -18.16% |
| October | 4,431,800 | -21.10% |
Due to this ridership loss, RTA is now projecting a shortfall in passenger revenue of $2 million by the end of 2009.
If RTA had not built the Waterfront Line, would RTA still have these financial challenges?
Yes. The financial issues related to the drop in sales tax, population and funding from the State of Ohio, and not the construction and operation
of the Waterfront Line.
The decision to build the Waterfront Line was made 15 years ago in the early 1990's, with an opening date in 1996. The State of Ohio was a major
contributor towards the construction. RTA issued approximately $50 million in capital bonds to pay for the balance of the project, the majority of
which were retired in 2002. These bonds, which were for "Capital" purposes, are not available to cover operating costs, such as operator salaries and
fuel for the Community Circulators. The Waterfront Line serves major community venues such as the Rock Hall, Science Center, the Flats, Voinovich
Park and Browns Stadium.
Although this service was very successful in the early years as the Flats were a major destination for Clevelanders, due to low ridership as a result
of the issues in the Flats, the Waterfront Line service level has been reduced, and now operates on weekdays only during commuting hours. This has
significantly reduced RTA's costs to provide the service. The direct cost to operate the Waterfront Line in 2009 is approximately $100,000, which is
much less than the cost to operate the Community Circulator service, which is approximately $5 million.
In the future, when plans are realized to revitalize the Flats and the Waterfront, this service will be expanded to serve these new venues.
If RTA had not built the HealthLine on Euclid Avenue, would RTA still have these financial challenges?
Yes. The financial issues related to the drop in sales tax, population and funding from the State of Ohio, and not the construction and operation of
the HealthLine.
As a matter of fact, an independent study by a professional financial management firm hired by the Federal Transit Administration concluded that RTA
would be much stronger financially with the project, than without the project.
Most of the funds used for the HealthLine were from a special federal transportation grants that could only be used to build this project. If RTA
turned down the grants, the funds would have been re-allocated to a competing project in another state.
RTA sold capital bonds to pay for a required local share on the project in the amount of approximately $20 million, which is about the same amount
as was spent for the vehicles alone and represent only about 10% of the total project investment.
Because RTA is able to operate the HealthLine more efficiently than it could the service it replaced (the #6 bus line), RTA was able to secure some
level of CMAQ operating grants, and was able to sell the naming rights under a 25-year agreement, the HealthLine is a real financial winner for RTA
and is actually helping to balance our budget.
This project brought jobs and economic development investment to the region that will benefit RTA, its customers and the taxpayers for years to come.
What are some of the service cuts made effective September 20, 2009?
Per Board Policy, the staff annually looks at the least productive bus routes in terms of the number of customers per vehicle-hour of service.
All circulator routes were discontinued on September 20, 2009:
#801 Lee-Harvard Circulator
#802 Southeast Circulator
#803 St. Clair-Hough Circulator
#804 Lakewood Circulator
#805 Slavic Village Circulator
#806 Euclid-Euclid Beach Circulator
#807 Tremont Circulator
#808 West Shore Circulator
#809 Kamm's-Puritas Circulator
#820 St. Clair-Five Point Circulator
#821 University Circle-Heights Area Circulator
#822 Southwest Circulator
The following routes were discontinued on September 20, 2009:
#18 W. 11th-Hinckley
#33 Central
#87 Westwood
#96 Butternut
The following routes were adjusted on September 20, 2009:
#5 Chagrin
#43 Lake-Wolf
#46 Rocky River-Westlake (Detroit)
#49 Center Ridge
#68 Bagley
#70 Bunts-W. 150th
#76 Broadway-Turney
#83 W. 130th
#86 Warren-Berea
#88 Broadway-Northfield
#90F Broadway-Libby
If service has to be cut in 2010, under consideration is the elimination of:
- Sunday/Holiday Service - which can reduced expenses by approximately $5 million annually, and reduce staffing by 66 positions.
- Saturday Service - which can reduce expenses by approximately $7 million annually, and reduce staffing by 93 positions.
- Elimination of Saturday and Sunday/Holiday Service - which can reduce expenses by approximately $12 million annually, and reduce staffing by
159 positions.
- Other low ridership routes.
Our goal is obviously not to reduce any service, or cut any positions, but develop ways to increase revenues and/or reduce the cost of delivering
our services, in order to balance our budget.
Public Informational Meetings
RTA held a series of twelve public informational meetings in Mid-August to assist customers impacted by upcoming changes in service with available travel options.
What are the next steps in developing the RTA budget for 2010?
- November 9, 2009 - The staff will present their proposed 2010 budget at Board of Trustees Finance Committee Meetings.
- November 17, 2009 - RTA proposed Service Plan for 2010 will be presented to a joint Finance and Operations Committee meeting.
- December 1, 2009 - RTA proposed capital Improvement Plan for 2010 will be presented to a joint Finance and Planning and Development
Committee meeting. Also, a Public Hearing on the budget will be held at the RTA Offices.
- December 15, 2009 - A second Public Hearing on the budget will be held at the RTA Offices, followed by the planned approval of the
2010 budget at the regular Board of Trustee Meetings at the RTA Offices.
All meetings are open to the public and are held at RTA Headquarters, located at 1240 W. 6th Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44113.
Customers who have specific questions or suggestions can email us at public-comment@gcrta.org.
RTA's 6-Step Plan to Preserve Transit Service and Transit Jobs in 2010
November 11, 2009
RTA has taken steps to balance the 2009 budget, but is facing a $17.5 million projected budget shortfall for 2010. If this shortfall cannot be addressed, it will lead to
further cuts in transit service, including the possible elimination of weekend public transit service, and the layoffs of up to 200 additional employees at RTA.
RTA's goal is to preserve transit service and to preserve transit jobs to the greatest extent possible. Following is a proposed "6-Step Plan" - involving the State of Ohio,
NOACA, RTA Personnel and RTA customers - through which RTA seeks to achieve this important goal:
State of Ohio and NOACA
1. RTA is requesting that the State of Ohio work with NOACA to provide $8 million of grant funding for operations, and $3.456M of grant funding for ADA/Paratransit for
2010 and 2011. Of this amount, $6.2 million is already programmed for 2010, with the balance pending.
RTA Personnel
2. Reduction of personnel costs through reduction of positions, payroll and fringe benefits:
- December 2008: RTA reduced salaried positions by 5% (complete)
- September 2009: Layoff of 53 bargaining unit employees (85 total positions) as a result of elimination of Community Circulator service (complete)
- November 2009: RTA reduced salaried positions by an additional 3% (complete)
3. Reduce aggregate payroll costs of RTA personnel:
- January 2009: Salaries of RTA's salaried staff were frozen (complete)
- June 2009: Salaries of RTA's salaried staff were reduced by 3% (complete)
- Deferral of last pay in 2009 to early 2010 for salaried staff (in process)
- RTA has proposed to achieve significant labor cost reductions through collective bargaining with unions representing its bargaining unit employees (pending)
4. Achieve cost savings through changes to RTA health insurance program:
- RTA has proposed to achieve health care cost savings through collective bargaining with unions representing its bargaining unit employees (pending)
5. Achieve cost savings by changing or deferring certain employment benefits:
- RTA has proposed to cost savings through collective bargaining with unions representing its bargaining unit employees (pending)
RTA Customers
6. The RTA staff proposes to maintain current fares ($2.25 base) for 2010 and 2011 (pending). If authorized, Public Hearings on this proposal will take place in early
2010. This will generate an additional $8.4 million in revenue for RTA to fund important services.
The following is the text of a memo distributed to all RTA employees on November 12, 2009:
I am writing to update all employees on the status of the RTA 2010 budget, which I know is of much interest to you, our customers, and which will certainly attract much
media attention over the next several weeks.
Based upon 3rd quarter 2009 results, it is now anticipated that RTA will end 2009 with a positive balance of approximately $879,000. Although far less than our goal of
an ending balance equivalent to one month's operating expenses, which would be approximately $20 million, it certainly represents an improvement over previous
projections.
This projected positive balance was only achieved through:
- An 8% reduction of salaried staff positions
- A 3% reduction of salaries for non-union employees
- An additional 25-cent fare increase implemented on September 1, and
- A 6% service cut, which included the elimination of the Community Circulators on September 20, 2009, eliminating 85 positions at RTA.
Unfortunately, there is still a chance that certain grants will not be approved in a timely manner, which will result in a negative balance. We are working diligently
with the FTA to avoid this situation.
As previously communicated, the national recession has caused RTA's largest source of revenues, Cuyahoga County sales tax, to generate a projected $18.5 million less in
2009 than 2008 levels. Furthermore, the State of Ohio reduced its funding for public transportation by 33% in the recently approved budget for 2010 and 2011. This
situation is certainly not unique to RTA but one that is common to 9 out of 10 transit systems in the nation.
Detailed information about this budget crisis can be found on our website: RideRTA.com, by going to the "Budget Challenges" link that can be found on the main page. This
document also includes a 6-Step Plan to preserve transit service and transit jobs in 2010, which we are following, to try to address this crisis.
As a result of these financial challenges, the only way RTA can develop a balanced budget for 2010, will be through a combination of:
- Cost savings strategies
- New revenues from the State of Ohio
- Increases in fares, and
- Additional service reductions and layoffs.
The budget proposal presented on November 9, 2009, to the RTA Board of Trustees contains the following assumptions in order to achieve a balanced budget:
- A reduction in bus and train service, equal to an annual 12% cut, which will eliminate 150 to 200 RTA positions.
- The continuation of fares at the current level of $2.25 base fare, which represents a 50-cent increase to our customers over the base of $1.75, implemented as a
two step fuel surcharge in August 2008.
- The reduction of 12% of our service will be the same as eliminating one out of every 8 current trips. If fares fall back to the $1.75 base fare level, it would
necessitate an approximate 21% service reduction, which would be the same as eliminating one out of every 5 current trips.
The 2010 budget process will continue on November 17, December 1, and on December 15, 2009, with public input encouraged at the December 1 and December 15 meetings. It
is anticipated that the RTA Board of Trustees will discuss and approve a budget on December 15, 2009.
The specifics of the staff proposal for major changes to bus and train service, as well as any change to fares, will be discussed at several Public Hearings anticipated
to be held in January 2010. Following the Public Hearings, final decisions will be made, and changes implemented on April 4, 2010.
Let me assure you that RTA has and continues to take advantage of all possible government subsidies to preserve service. We were, for example, able to use approximately
$6 million of the Federal ARRA Stimulus Funding to assist our budget in 2009. However, this one-time money will not be available in 2010. The balance of the Stimulus
funding cannot, by law, be used to add or preserve jobs but only for major capital projects. Already included in the 2010 budget, is the anticipated use of an
approximate $8 million grant awarded by NOACA.
I again solicit your input into this process, and encourage you to share the importance of adequate funding for public transit with your customers and with elected
officials who make decisions on the amount of funds they approve for public transportation. While the typical state in the nation invests 23% of the cost of public
transit in their state, Ohio provides less than 3%.
Please be assured that we will take great efforts to minimize the reduction of service and to preserve as many positions as possible.
We will also strive to keep you informed of our progress. Any suggestions or ideas that you may have to save jobs at RTA can be communicated to us at
gm@gcrta.org.
|  |  |
|